Canada Crypto Bank’s “Borrow Against Your BTC” Trap: A CA$96,800 Collateral Scam
Raymond didn’t think of himself as someone who could be scammed. He wasn’t chasing a 300% return — he just needed liquidity without selling his Bitcoin, and Canada Crypto Bank offered exactly that. The trap was built for careful people, which is precisely why it worked.
How they reached in
The pitch was sober and professional: pledge your BTC as collateral, receive a fiat loan at a modest rate, get your coins back when you repay. Canada Crypto Bank had a polished site, “custody” language, and a representative who never once pushed him.
Raymond transferred his Bitcoin to the “collateral wallet” they specified. The dashboard confirmed receipt and showed his loan as “approved, pending release.”
Where it turned
The release never came. First it was a “collateral-coverage top-up” because BTC had moved. Then an “anti-money-laundering deposit” that would be refunded with the loan. Each step asked for more of the same coins he’d come for a loan to avoid spending.
The moment your collateral leaves your wallet and the “loan” depends on you sending still more, there is no loan. There is only a queue of fees designed to last exactly as long as you keep paying.
What I did
- I separated collateral from fees. Two different flows mattered: the original BTC collateral, and the “top-up” payments. I traced them independently because they often end up in different places.
- I followed the BTC through the consolidation hops. The collateral was moved through a short chain of wallets before heading toward off-ramps — a pattern I see constantly and can document hash by hash.
- I identified two receiving exchanges. Part of the Bitcoin reached deposit addresses at platforms with real compliance desks. That is where leverage exists.
- I filed evidenced reports and requested holds. With the trail attached, I asked both exchanges to freeze the associated balances and flag the receiving accounts.
- I built his FINTRAC and bank file. For everything beyond reach, I assembled a documented complaint so his formal reports carried the on-chain proof rather than a story.
CA$56,100 of CA$96,800 was recovered — chiefly from a freeze on one exchange that still held a portion of the routed Bitcoin. The “top-up” coins sent last were the hardest to chase; the original collateral, moved earlier and more clumsily, was where most of the recovery came from.
What gave it away
- A “loan” that requires you to send the collateral to their wallet
- Fees that must be paid before funds are released — and never stop
- “AML deposits” or “coverage top-ups” promised to be refunded later
- A lender with no verifiable licence in your jurisdiction
- Calm, patient pressure rather than urgency — built to disarm careful people
A “loan” that ate your collateral?
Pledged crypto that never came back is still traceable from the moment it left your wallet. Send me the details and I’ll tell you honestly what’s recoverable.
Submit your case →