Skip to content
Case File · SM-2026-0403 · P2P / OTC escrow scam

The Myforexp2p Escrow That Never Held the Money: A $96,400 P2P Trade Gone Wrong

Andre is the case I think about when people assume recovery is a guarantee. He did a lot right, and I still couldn’t get all of it back. I’m publishing this one precisely because an honest 38% tells you more about how this works than a tidy success story would.

Operator
Method
Fake P2P/OTC “escrow” release
Reported loss
$96,400 (USDT)
Came to me
5 weeks after the trade — late
Funds recovered
$36,600 · 38%
Client
“Andre”, Houston TX

How they reached in

Andre wanted to move a large USDT position to cash at a better rate than an exchange offered. A counterparty on Myforexp2p proposed a peer-to-peer deal “protected by platform escrow,” and the interface dutifully showed his coins as “held in escrow pending buyer payment.”

The escrow was a label on a page, nothing more. His USDT had gone to a wallet the operators controlled the instant he “funded” the trade.

Where it turned

The “buyer’s payment” was marked complete on the platform but never arrived in his bank. Support insisted he “release” the escrow, then went quiet. By the time he accepted what had happened, weeks had passed.

Time is the variable I can’t manufacture. Five weeks gave the operators room to layer the funds through far more hops than a five-day report would have faced.

“The word escrow did all the work. I assumed it meant a third party held my coins. It meant nothing at all.”— Andre, intake call

What I did

  1. I traced from the funding transaction outward. The single “escrow funding” transfer was the anchor. From there I followed the USDT through each subsequent hop and recorded the split points.
  2. I separated what was reachable from what wasn’t. A meaningful share had already passed through a mixer-like consolidation and went dark. I told Andre that plainly rather than chasing it.
  3. I focused on the branch that hit an exchange. One arm of the funds reached an identifiable exchange deposit address. That branch was where any real recovery would come from.
  4. I filed and pushed for a hold on that branch. With the on-chain report attached, the platform held the associated balance pending its own review.
  5. I documented the whole flow for his dispute. He got a complete evidence pack — far stronger than the platform’s own “trade record” — for his bank and police filing.
Recovered for Andre
38%

$36,600 of $96,400 came back, all of it from the single branch that reached a cooperative exchange. The rest was moved through obscuring infrastructure before he reached me. This is an honest outcome, and a fair warning: weeks matter, and “escrow” on an unregulated platform protects no one but the operator.

What gave it away

  • “Escrow” that exists only as a status label on the platform’s own page
  • A counterparty who insists you “release” before money clears your bank
  • Better-than-market rates for moving a large position off-exchange
  • No independent, verifiable custodian named anywhere
  • Support that coaches you to release, then disappears
— Seamus ManleyLead Investigator · Seamus Manley Investigations

Even late, one branch can still be live.

P2P and OTC “escrow” scams rarely return everything — but the branch that touched a real exchange is often reachable. Let me look at your trail.

Submit your case →

Not Financial Advice

Seamus Manley content is informational and investigative. Nothing on this site constitutes financial advice.

No Recovery Guarantees

Outcomes depend on blockchain finality, jurisdiction, and third-party cooperation. Anyone promising instant, guaranteed recovery up-front, in crypto, without written terms — should be treated as a follow-up scam.

Editorial Standards

Sources: account-holder reports, OSINT, blockchain analytics, and regulator actions (ASIC, BaFin, FCA, SEC, CFTC, FINRA, IC3). Corrections: /submit-a-case/.

© 2026 Seamus Manley. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact